The Flying Car Gets Real

Posted by admin on October 12th, 2008

The team at Terrafugia is about to fulfill the fantasy of every driver pilot: a consumer vehicle that can take to the highways and the skies. All they have to do is finish the first one

http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/files/articles/flyingcar.jpg

The Transition is not a flying car. The vehicle, set to go on sale next year, will cruise smoothly on the road and through the sky. It will have four wheels, Formula One–style suspension, and a pair of 10-foot-wide wings that fold up when it switches from air to asphalt. And when the engineers at Terrafugia in Woburn, Massachusetts, let me sit inside their just-finished proof-of-concept vehicle and grab the steering wheel, it’s easy to imagine piloting this thing up and out of traffic, into the open skies.

Click to continue reading “The Flying Car Gets Real”
Go straight to Post

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • BlinkList
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • SphereIt
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Japanese researchers eye ‘e-skin’ for robots

Posted by admin on August 17th, 2008

TOKYO (AFP) - Japanese researchers say they have developed a rubber that is able to conduct electricity well, paving the way for robots with stretchable “e-skin” that can feel heat and pressure like humans.

http://d.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/afp/20080812/capt.cps.ngn55.120808100545.photo00.photo.default-512x382.jpg?x=400&y=298&sig=z4U0HqCQDGV2O4YHf_lf3A--

The material is the first in the world to solve the problems faced by metals — which are conductive but do not stretch — and rubber, which hardly transmits electricity, according to the team at the University of Tokyo.

The new technology is flexible like ordinary rubber but boasts conductivity some 570 times as high as commercially available rubbers filled with carbon particles, said the team led by Takao Someya at the university’s School of Engineering.

Click to continue reading “Japanese researchers eye ‘e-skin’ for robots”
Go straight to Post

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • BlinkList
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • SphereIt
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

The Future of Space Robots

Posted by admin on July 6th, 2008

Scientists envision ‘bots working intelligently while exploring distant worlds

http://msnbcmedia2.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photo_StoryLevel/080702/080702-eve-02.h2.jpg

EVE, otherwise known as the Extra-terrestrial Vegetation Evaluator, represents an intelligent probe sent to an abandoned Earth in the film “WALL-E.”

A spaceship descends with a thunderous roar and deposits a futuristic probe before taking off again. The Extraterrestrial Vegetation Evaluator (EVE) soon activates and begins flying around, scanning the barren surface for signs of life.

Click to continue reading “The Future of Space Robots”
Go straight to Post

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • BlinkList
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • SphereIt
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Water-powered cars will never work

Posted by admin on June 23rd, 2008

EcoGeek went live more than two years ago with no fanfare and no traffic. We had a readership of about five people. Three days later, I received the first notice of a breakthrough water-powered car that would solve our energy problems. Those emails have not stopped since.

We wrote a while back about why getting power from water is entirely impossible. But we didn’t apply it directly to cars … so here we go again.

This story at Reuters, which claims that hydrogen is “extracted” from water to power a car is a big steaming pile. I don’t know how these things slip through the cracks. I guess we’d all love for there to be a simple solution to the energy crisis. Solutions exist, but this isn’t one of them.

Generally these things are picked up on local news stations who have poor fact checking and (obviously) no knowledge of the laws of physics. But the fact that Reuters did a whole story on one of these bogus machines, and then it traveled undeterred around the blogosphere, is simply inexcusable.

“Water-powered cars” generally work like this: Energy stored in a battery or generated by an on-board gasoline-powered generator, splits water into hydrogen and oxygen. The two are then recombined, either in an internal combustion engine or in a fuel cell. Energy from the fuel cell or the engine then drives the car.

So, simplifying this, they’re breaking water into hydrogen and oxygen and then burning hydrogen and oxygen to create water. This is, of course, possible, but you can’t get more energy out of the system than you put in. Otherwise, it’s simply a perpetual motion machine.

If it worked, it could sit on the driveway and make energy all day, every day, and power the entire world without you ever needing to put anything in it. In short, if it worked, it would break the laws of physics, and we would never need to burn another piece of coal again.

This would be an extraordinarily easy thing to prove. Too bad none of these people who make these wonderful devices are too busy talking to the local news to actually build one.

There are a lot of variations on the water-powered car, but they’re all bogus. People who say that adding gasoline-generated hydrogen to gasoline increases your gas mileage by 30% are full of it. It doesn’t matter if they call it HHO or H20 or Brown’s gas. It doesn’t matter if they’re creating it with a battery or a flywheel. It doesn’t matter if they’ve postulated a sixth dimension from which flows seemingly endless amounts of energy.

Until someone puts a box on the driveway and it generates more power than goes into it … everyone who says you can power a car with water is either a fool or trying to take someone else’s money.

Go straight to Post

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • BlinkList
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • SphereIt
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Loving Robots Could Be a Reality by 2050

Posted by admin on June 22nd, 2008

image via

In movies like Ridley Scott’s classic Bladerunner, robots are ultimately portrayed as having feelings and possessing a conscience. A slightly scary, but nonetheless intriguing thought comes to mind: they fight for survival; they appear more human than machine.

Predictably, this may soon no longer be confined to the realms of science fiction. Yep. Scientists say that in about 40 years, a robot could become the perfect lover and sex machine… literally.

David Levy, author of Love + Sex with Robots, said during an international conference at the University of Maastricht in southeastern Netherlands, that by 2050, robots would be able to serve as human-like lovers and not just mechanical sex slaves. Within the next four years, advanced robots will be sold as sex toys, he claims.

Giving emotions to a machine is not an easy task. In order for them to become good lovers, they need to be taught to have human characteristics and certain personality traits. They need consciousness of their own. For example, when they tell their human lovers ‘I love you’, they must really ‘mean’ it or at least be perceived to mean it. Perhaps they’ll also be ‘trained’ to be jealous! However, more important problems need to be resolved first…

According to Levy, one important ability which is particularly difficult to program is conversation, a sustaining pillar of all loving relationships. Additionally to be great in bed, the robots will need to possess sensors and electronic speech abilities to make them seem real, when a human touches their “sensitive zones.â€Â

There are various scenarios as to how this could play out. In fact the possibilities are infinite. Will the robots be more attractive than the real opposite sex? Will that lead to self-imposed sterility for the geeks that fall in love with their super hot robot women? Will less people cheat on each other? Or will copulating with a robot be considered adultery?

All of these questions are yet to be resolved. What do you think?

Via environmentalgraffiti.com

Go straight to Post

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Reddit
  • Furl
  • BlinkList
  • Google
  • YahooMyWeb
  • SphereIt
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Copyright © 2007 Advanced Invention. All rights reserved.

Directory of Science Blogs | Find Blogs in the Blog
Directory | Bloglisting.net - The internets fastest growing blog directory | Science Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory | Blog Directory | blog directory

 Blog Directory | Blog Directory | Blogs Directory